Skip navigation. Regardless of the code of ethics to which you subscribe, being ethical in your teaching requires that you anticipate problems that may arise as you teach and that you think about how you would respond to them. Ultimately, your interaction with students is governed by University policy, but here are some precepts to consider. Offer your students the intellectual and social tools they need to succeed in your class. For example, if you want your students to write a research paper, make sure you assess their ability to gather and organize material and teach them the expectations for research in your discipline. Not giving your students the skills to do the job only sets them up for failure. Show you care about the success of all your students, not just those who consistently make brilliant comments or are particularly charismatic. It is important you actively seek ways to pique the intellectual curiosity of all your students; this often means varying class topics, activities, and assessments. Be a professional role model for your students. You should demonstrate to students how professionals in your field address intellectual problems.
This policy ensures freedom from reprisal for faculty and students to examine all pertinent data, to question assumptions, to be guided by the evidence of scholarly research, to teach and study the substance of a given discipline, and to fully participate in the development and debate of institutional policies and procedures and relevant matters in the classroom. While some course materials and activities require a uniform approach, such as assessment of course learning outcomes and accrediting standards, DSC supports faculty innovation and experimentation in the development of pedagogy and course assignments.
Department committees play an important role in setting standards and expectations but their decisions or recommendations should be routinely brought back to the full department for discussion. Faculty who want to experiment with assignments and approaches should be able to, with the knowledge that outcomes will be assessed and effectiveness of the approach must be demonstrable. The Board affirms the principles of academic freedom and responsibility in accordance with the mission of the College.
The Policy also states that faculty or staff employees may not supervise or evaluate students to whom they are related by blood, law, or marriage. Because the.
An investigation into those claims is currently underway by an independent party, while a parallel discussion takes place about whether sexual relations between professors and students should be allowed at all. The issue of consensual, yet highly questionable student-teacher relationships is a complicated one that lends itself to no easy answers.
No major Canadian university currently explicitly forbids teacher-student relations — and based on their reticence to change anything, most appear to believe that their codes of conduct and sexual-assault policies in place provide enough protection for their students. But in light of revelations that a number of reported cases of sexual harassment at Canadian universities have been mishandled, or even silenced by university administrations, some are starting to question that.
This past year — even before the Steven Galloway scandal broke — the University of British Columbia UBC started assessing whether professors should be barred from having romantic relationships with their students, as part of developing their new sexual-assault policy. Author Steven Galloway was fired last year from UBC, which cited “a record of misconduct that resulted in an irreparable breach of the trust placed in faculty members.
The fact remains, however, that there is a major power imbalance between a professor and a student — one that can easily be exploited by someone with predatory inclinations. Judging by many of the recent testimonials of former students, this not only prevents many victims from coming forward, but also raises the question of whether it prevents students from being in a position to truly consent to any type of relationship at all. It needs to stop. This past year, the Quebec Students Union, which represents 72, university students across the province, recommended that professor-student relationships be banned as part of overall consultations on sexual violence.
In , after Harvard enacted their ban, 80 professors and students signed a letter that was published in French-language daily Le Devoir , requesting exactly that. But the demand has been met with skepticism from the Quebec Federation of University Professors, who argue that, while they understand the inevitable complications and risks, such a ban would be extremely difficult to enforce.
It adopted a strict position two years ago regarding teacher-student relations and considers them highly unethical and inappropriate. This past December, Quebec passed Bill , An act to prevent and fight sexual violence in higher education institutions.
Former Student, Fair Game?
Physical contact is not a required element of such relationships. A Covered Relationship may exist on the basis of a single interaction. The University of Michigan strives to create and maintain a community that enables each person to reach their full potential. To do so requires an environment of trust, openness, civility, and respect. The teacher-student relationship lies at the foundation of the educational process.
“Professional educators shall exert reasonable effort to protect the student from sexual or romantic invitations;; dating or soliciting dates;; engaging in that their colleagues conform to the appropriate standard of ethical practice as well.
Policy Statement Syracuse University is committed to maintaining a healthy, safe, respectful, and productive working, learning, and teaching environment. This Policy provides a framework for defining and preventing inappropriate conduct by University Faculty Members and outlining the available procedural options for those who believe themselves to have been subject to misconduct by a University Faculty Member.
Syracuse University is committed to educating the community about and enforcing the standards of community conduct elaborated below. Further, the University is committed to meeting standards of transparency, fairness, and accountability in acting upon and communicating this policy and the procedures that follow. Scope of Policy Any member of the University community student, staff, faculty, or administrator having a complaint concerning inappropriate conduct by a University Faculty Member may utilize this Policy and the Procedure that follows.
Responsibilities of University Faculty Members University Faculty Members share responsibility for University governance and for the maintenance of the tenets of the University Code of Ethical Conduct.
Ethical Teaching (FERPA)
Categorized: General Policies. Responsible Office: Compliance, Diversity, and Ethics. Sexual or romantic relationships between employees and students have the effect of undermining the atmosphere of trust on which the educational process depends. Positions of authority inherently carry the element of power in their relationships with Students. It is imperative that those in authority neither abuse, nor appear to abuse, this power entrusted to them.
Integrity can be compromised when employees evaluate the work or academic performance of students with whom they have a sexual or romantic relationship.
A professor has a potential teacher-student relationship with all students at a university, not just those in his or her classes. Dating a student who.
The provisions of this Code apply to persons whose service to the University includes teaching, scholarship, librarianship, and academic administration. The central functions of an academic community are learning, teaching, and scholarship. They must be characterized by reasoned discourse, intellectual honesty, mutual respect, and openness to constructive change. By accepting membership in this community, an individual neither surrenders rights nor escapes fundamental responsibilities as a citizen, but acquires additional rights as well as responsibilities to the entire University community.
They do not require the individual to be passive and silent. They do require recognition of how easily an academic community can be violated. This Code contains two major sections: first, a statement of rights and responsibilities; and second, a statement of enforcement procedures. The first section is divided into three subsections.
‘Abuse of power’: should universities ban staff-student relationships?
Academic Freedom and Responsibility. Office Hours. Professional Ethics.
Responsible Office: Compliance, Diversity, and Ethics This policy applies to all faculty, staff and students of George Mason University. II. POLICY STATEMENT.
Relationships between a faculty member and a student, or a staff member such as a coach, adviser, college administrator, or employment supervisor and a student, are considered professional relationships. These professional relationships carry an inherent power differential. Where such a power differential exists, it compromises the real or perceived freedom of the student’s ability to begin, alter or terminate a romantic or sexual relationship.
Therefore, for faculty and staff, the initiation of or engagement in a romantic or sexual relationship with a student wherein a power differential exists is prohibited. Therefore, even in cases in which the faculty or staff member does not hold a current position of authority or supervision over the student, romantic or sexual relationships between faculty or staff members and students present the individual and institutional risks and liabilities outlined below, including possible disciplinary action.
Faculty and staff who are aware of a romantic or sexual relationship between a faculty or staff member and a student should report their concerns to their supervisors. The student who makes the complaint is entitled to processes specified in Title IX policies. If the process moves beyond consultation or informal resolution and results in a formal complaint process, the faculty or staff member who is accused is entitled to due process as specified in employment regulations and contractual language applicable to their collective bargaining unit.
If determined to have engaged in the prohibited behavior, the faculty or staff member could be subject to:. A faculty or staff member involved in a romantic or sexual relationship with a student that predates the adoption of this policy, or who enters the College community with such a relationship already in place, must promptly disclose the relationship to their supervisor. Edit Page. Connect With Us. Consensual Relationships Policy.
Consensual Relationships Policy
W ithin weeks of starting her postgraduate degree, Allison Smith, then a student at Sussex University, entered a relationship with her lecturer. He later approached her on Twitter. The month relationship ended when Salter assaulted Smith, for which he received a week prison sentence , suspended for 18 months in Although universities defend relationships between students and staff on grounds of personal freedom, experts on sexual misconduct warn that relationships where one party is in a position of power relative to the other, especially when there are significant age gaps, carry a higher risk of ending in abuse.
They can also be problematic in other ways. She identifies additional complications: other students might feel excluded from the advantages they perceive their peers in relationships with staff members to receive.
Extracted from ACA Code of Academic Ethics. Relations with Students: With regard to relations with students, the term “faculty” or “faculty member” means all.
A number of colleges and universities banned faculty-undergraduate dating or otherwise shored up their consensual relationship policies after the Education Department published a reminder letter about sexual harassment liability, in Other institutions had adopted such policies earlier. And while many involved in or affected by these decisions support them as preventing potential abuse, others remain critical of policing connections between consenting adults.
Fear of legal liability and increasing acknowledgement of academic power structures changed that, leading institutions to adopt a mix of policies regarding these relationships. Its rationale for doing so, stated in the policy itself, sums up much of the thinking behind blanket bans on undergraduate-faculty dating. Northwestern previously banned relationships between graduate students and faculty supervisors. There is no hardfast rule about these policies. Somewhere in the middle of the policy mix, the University of Wisconsin System in banned faculty-student dating graduate or undergraduate where an advisory or supervisory relationship, or the potential for one, exists.
Improper Relationships between Students & Employees
In Pennsylvania, school attendance is compulsory and thus parents are mandated to entrust their children to our education system. It is from this foundation that the duty of teachers to act as a fiduciary in their students’ best interest and to create and maintain a safe environment for their students derives. The overwhelming majority of educators in Pennsylvania exercise their fiduciary responsibilities with care and conviction.
Teacher-student relationships carry risks of conflict of interest, breach of trust, abuse of power, and breach of professional ethics. For these reasons, teachers.
Once you have made a selection, click the “Order Course” button. You will then be directed to create a new account. Need more information? Complete comparative list of different Codes of Ethics on a variety of topics. As a result, multiple roles of teacher-therapist and student-client were very common and often unavoidable in such training institutions and programs. Trainees are allowed to fulfill the therapy or analysis requirement with therapists or analysts from outside the institutes in order to avoid the dual roles of clients and students.
The issues of sexual relationships between faculty and students in training institutions and graduate and post-graduate programs has also been a major concern in recent decades. Marriage and family therapists are aware of their influential positions with respect to clients, and they avoid exploiting the trust and dependency of such persons. Therapists, therefore, make every effort to avoid conditions and multiple relationships with clients that could impair professional judgment or increase the risk of exploitation.
When the risk of impairment or exploitation exists due to conditions or multiple roles, therapists document the appropriate precautions taken. Marriage and family therapists do not engage in sexual or other forms of harassment of clients, students, trainees, supervisees, employees, colleagues, or research subjects. Marriage and family therapists do not engage in the exploitation of clients, students, trainees, supervisees, employees, colleagues, or research subjects.